<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows 7 Release Candidate Rumors were wrong &#8211; only at build 7046</title>
	<atom:link href="http://windows7center.com/news/windows-7-release-candidate-rumors-were-wrong-only-at-build-7046/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://windows7center.com/news/windows-7-release-candidate-rumors-were-wrong-only-at-build-7046/</link>
	<description>Windows 7 news, rumors, screenshots, and info</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:03:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Windows 7 Release Candidate to be released to public on May 5th</title>
		<link>http://windows7center.com/news/windows-7-release-candidate-rumors-were-wrong-only-at-build-7046/#comment-3602</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows 7 Release Candidate to be released to public on May 5th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7center.com/?p=1916#comment-3602</guid>
		<description>[...] Windows 7 Release Candidate Rumors were wrong - only at build 7046 Earlier today, ArsTechnica received confirmation from a Microsoft Employee that development on the RC branch&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Windows 7 Release Candidate Rumors were wrong &#8211; only at build 7046 Earlier today, ArsTechnica received confirmation from a Microsoft Employee that development on the RC branch&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Understanding how Windows 7 Build numbers work</title>
		<link>http://windows7center.com/news/windows-7-release-candidate-rumors-were-wrong-only-at-build-7046/#comment-3542</link>
		<dc:creator>Understanding how Windows 7 Build numbers work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7center.com/?p=1916#comment-3542</guid>
		<description>[...] Windows 7 Release Candidate Rumors were wrong - only at build 7046 Earlier today, ArsTechnica received confirmation from a Microsoft Employee that development on the RC branch&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Windows 7 Release Candidate Rumors were wrong &#8211; only at build 7046 Earlier today, ArsTechnica received confirmation from a Microsoft Employee that development on the RC branch&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows 7 Release Candidate Rumors were wrong - only at build 7046 &#124; Windows 7 Center &#124; WinSe7en</title>
		<link>http://windows7center.com/news/windows-7-release-candidate-rumors-were-wrong-only-at-build-7046/#comment-1577</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows 7 Release Candidate Rumors were wrong - only at build 7046 &#124; Windows 7 Center &#124; WinSe7en</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 17:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7center.com/?p=1916#comment-1577</guid>
		<description>[...] Windows 7 Release Candidate Rumors were wrong - only at build 7046 &#124; Windows 7 Center. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Windows 7 Release Candidate Rumors were wrong &#8211; only at build 7046 | Windows 7 Center. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://windows7center.com/news/windows-7-release-candidate-rumors-were-wrong-only-at-build-7046/#comment-1492</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7center.com/?p=1916#comment-1492</guid>
		<description>Paul is Administrator of geeksmack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul is Administrator of geeksmack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
