Windows 7 Build 6956 leaked by an attendee at WinHEC China
The impossible has been done again and pirates all over the world are busy trying to obtain the more updated build of Windows 7- build 6956. Just a day after WinHEC China began, an attendee from the conference managed to slip a Virtual Hard Disk (VHD) image of Windows 7 Build 6956 onto a portable device and upload it via torrent to the world. You’d think that Microsoft would have some sort of security enforced to keep this from happening after how hard they’ve been trying to prevent any leaks. The uploader from the PCBeta forum uses the alias Edward_Han, and is seen by the Chinese Windows community as a hero. The community has been referring to him as Edward_Han the hero, and even Master Edward_Han. The entire VHD image was actually supposed to be uploaded yesterday, but Ed’s computer shut off mysteriously, so the pirating had to be delayed for a day. As of now, there’s heated discussion on how to properly turn the VHD image into a fully functional install of Windows 7 Build 6959. A few have succeeded, but most people are having trouble and are awaiting for the Chinese hackers and community to get an ISO out. Word is starting to spread quickly in the English community in forums including our own, and many others. So far, from what we can tell, the following features are included in the build:
- Windows Peeking or Aero Peeking
- Desktop Slideshows
- Modified Start Menu and Taskbar (No arrows beside application icons)
For the doubtful, here are some screenshots of the build in action. Thanks to Mark for providing these: 
Since build 6956 was unreleased, I’m sure this leak counts as illegal. But Windows 7 Beta 1 is due to come out within a couple of weeks, and I’m sure Microsoft couldn’t be enjoying the hype generated around this any more than you and I could. More updates to come, stay tuned.
Please don’t forget to subscribe to our RSS feed to receive regular updates on Windows 7 News. Email subscription can be found on the top right corner of the page.
Update: The ISO has been created by NetRolller3D from AeroXP and is in the process of uploading right now
Update 2: ISO has been created by the Chinese Windows community, check out this post
Update 3: Tons of new Windows 7 Build 6956 screenshots in high quality up now. Check it out!
Related posts:
Tags: windows 7, windows 7 build 6956, windows 7 build 6956 leak, windows 7 build 6956 screenshots
To discuss this topic, head on over to our forums!
98 Responses to “Windows 7 Build 6956 leaked by an attendee at WinHEC China”
Leave a Reply
To discuss this topic, head on over to our forums!
Loading ...
Torrent links (^_^)
http://dl-sh-ocn-2.pchome.net/06/al/WinHEC.6956.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/170378238/WinHEC.6956.rar
http://dl-sh-ocn-2.pchome.net/06/al/WinHEC.6956.rar
Hero ed can get the seed, but too bad he cannot create the ISO
Any thing new released in this version? I love the look and I’m hopeful that Windows 7 will effectively replace VIsta, but I’ve yet to see anything really revolutional from the new Windows 7 installment.
Suppose my main hassle with Vista has been compatibility, so if Microsoft have finally addressed this problem, Windows 7 will have my vote.
800HighTech´s last blog post..Apple Encourages Antivirus for Mac
I agree with you there is nothing that blows my mind but there are a ton of new features.
http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/first-look-windows-7-user-interface/
http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-touch-and-multi-touch-gestures-demonstrated-on-video/
http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-to-decrease-the-number-of-annoying-notifications-with-action-center/
http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-to-use-less-space-than-vista/
This reminds me of Kubuntu KDE 4.1 hell it sucked I had to reinstall Ubuntu, shame on the devs to force that down on us:
http://helpforlinux.blogspot.com/2008/11/7-things-to-do-after-installing-kubuntu.html
iampriteshdesai´s last blog post..Use Opera Mini in Ubuntu
Ugh that task bar is hideous. What’s the deal with the giant icons?
Ryan´s last blog post..Ad for Tempe High School’s Dance Dept.
It can be set to have a smaller icon but I like the big icons better. They have made the taskbar bigger by default so it can be more touch-friendly
beside being more touch friendly if you install firefox it will be on there- and if you open twenty of them they only take up that one space
ya that is pretty awesome, I still think it takes you have to hover over any icon or window too long for something to actually happen.
Also, they should move any opened windows to the end so you know what’s open and what’s not
yeah, that would be better- or even make it glow to show that you have it open
The new OS looks almost as interesting and feature-rich as a pile of dung.
Windows 7 actually is pretty great, especially for a pre-beta. The newest images put up are mine. As you can see my Windows 7 Experience score is really low. That’s because my computer is over 5 years old. 2ghz Pentium 4, 2GBs of DDR 400 ram, and 128mb of DDR video ram. Even with those specs, Win7 is running VERY well, with no hiccups what so ever. My only complaint is that the taskbar could use a little more polish, perhaps a bit shinier looking.
Perhaps you can put up some 30fps video to show how smoothly it runs? Although the specs you have is pretty good, especially the 2GB RAM. I thought you were the one with 512MB RAM? Thanks for the pictures by the way
it looks like it was made for people with bad vision with those gigantic icons.
I am just making the ISO
Nice!!
ISO is out guys
Uhm. Two things.
1: Apart from those three excellent _and_ groundbreaking new features, isn’t this just Vista +/- bells/bugs? 2: Am I the only person who thinks that the statement “…2ghz Pentium 4, 2GBs of DDR 400 ram, and 128mb of DDR video ram. Even with those specs, Win7 is running VERY well…” has some kind of flaw in its logic? When people are amazed that an OS (no mention of applications) runs well with a “mere” 2GHz CPU and 2GB of RAM, there’s something very, very wrong. :\ Where’re we going to be in another 5 years time? a “mere” 3GHz quad-core and 8GB of RAM?
Vista set such a high standard for hardware that now, the low-end of high standard hardware seems like a good deal for everyone. I think it’s a possibility that this could be part of Microsoft’s plan but I could be crazy
Hm. I admit that it’s difficult to buy anything under 2GHz dual-core these days, and RAM’s dirt cheap, but it still doesn’t excuse MS’s behaviour. Reminds me of those crazy ads you see on TV: “check your emails and surf the net with the fast new i7 processors!”. I mean, 99% of the (non-geek) people I know only use their computers for hotmail and YouTube. Should we really be forcing them to pay hundreds upon hundreds of £/$’s for cutting-edge hardware (_excluding_ the cost of Vista) to be able to do that? It’s only a good deal for people who can afford it. Crikey, I had an old K6-2 400MHz Win2k box that did all that “VERY well”…not a chance with Vista.
I think MS forget that the difference between writing applications that need bleeding-edge hardware and writing OS’s that need it is that applications are optional. Yeah, I’m an MS-whore myself (XP). But it doesn’t stop me advising everyone I meet to switch to linux instead of Vista. >:)
I agree that people shouldn’t be forced to upgrade their computer just to use the internet. I think MS should still be selling XP, I’m a tech guy and that’s what I still run.
I think that XP, without it’s security holes and vulnerabilities, is still usable in today’s standard. There was really nothing in Vista other than UAC (from an IT perspective) that would make you think you must upgrade because it’s better. I don’t think I will be seeing that with Windows 7, but seeing that XP’s support cycle is ending, we of course won’t be seeing XP forever
The great thing about computers is how fast the technology moves. In five years a 3Ghz quad-core should be insignificant, just look at how cheap dual-cores have gotten since they came out. Anyone running a five year old computer and expects to run the latest operating system that comes out smoothly does not understand technology.
Nick you are right. Despite the high numbers, a gig of ram costs about 10 or less dollars today anyway. I don’t think there should be any complaints towards the Windows 7 specs at all. Vista was a big leap, but it’s been 3 years
Meh, it’s not so much that it’s got high requirements, it’s more a question of “bang for your buck”. Unfortunately, MS seems to be confusing “bang” with “BSOD”.
XP worked/works great, is a lot more stable than 2k (I’d argue more stable than Vista too, even with the SPs), didn’t have high requirements at the time of release, and is reasonably secure. I’ve got Vista on a laptop – new laptop for work; didn’t have an XP option >:( – and in the last few months of using it, the only usable improvements are…well. None that I can see. General layout is annoying. The Aero interface and so forth are essentially just tech-demos of no real use. Explorer has been…”ass-raped”, I believe the term is. Control panel is useless, unless you’re 5 and only want to look at pretty pictures. Zip functionality is dubious at best. Etc. Even with 3GB of RAM it’s a memory hog, and trying to run it on 1GB or less is nightmarish, no matter what your CPU. When an OS needs over 4x the requirements of the previous version (check the MS site!), I expect some improvements! This is something that seems to be missing from Vista and especially Win7. I smell another WinME. 
PS: one reason I’m so annoyed with this is that my company *cough-cough-EMP-cough* are planning on upgrading from 2k straight to Vista/Win7, and it sickens me! Such a waste of money on all fronts…
Hey Krag, Windows Vista and 7 are designed to use memory ina different way. Microsoft believes idle memory is bad, so they will use all of it when possible (Superfetch) and will free it up when you need to use it such as playing a game or video conversion, etc. But I agree with you that it requires too much RAM for Vista to run smoothly.
Vista was too heavy on the hardware for sure. Windows 7 is sure to require less heavier specs, already we are seeing it being ran on notebooks and running smoothly on 1GB or even 512MB of RAM. As for the improvements, you are definitely right. There is nothing really revolutionary about Vista or 7. The only thing that is really useful is Aero Peek. I never group icons so Windows Peeking is pretty useless for me. Homegroup may be useful, but we will have to see in Beta 1 before deciding I suppose
By the way, if you like to discuss about Windows 7 topics, please check out our new forums =) http://windows7center.com/forums
Windows 7 is basically what Windows Vista suppose to be, it’s too bad Vista got a such a public impression cause it’s really not that bad.
Ned´s last blog post..Need for Speed Undercover Cheats
Before SP1 was quite bad I must say
Btw, after I sent those screengrabs I then made Win7 use only 512mbs of ram and then sent screens with 512 and it ran prety well. I wasn’t inferring that my specs were that low but just that Vista ran like crap on those specs and Win7 flies on them.
just wondering what was your CPU and gfx? And how smoothly did it run on 512. I’m shocked that it can run smoothly on 512MB
What kind of applications were you running for the test? Even XP was a bit choppy on 512MB, and I’ve never seen Vista run decently on less than 1.5GB if you want more than one IE window open simultaneously…
My CPU is a 2ghz P4 and my video card is a 128MB DDR Radeon 9600. It ran very smoothly and the apps I had open were Firefox with two tabs open, Windows Media Player playing a 1000 song playlist on shuffle, some explorer windows, and Paint. It finally started to slow down when I started Media Center with all those other apps open.
My brother has a P4 3.2GHz and 512MB on his XP installation and it works very smoothly. Gets about 40-50 fps on lowest settings in HL2 / CSS with his ATI Radeon 9200 SE
Link to torrent for iso is on this page http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/12/07/download-windows-7-pre-beta-build-6956-setup-installation-dvd-iso-image-torrent/
Hi,ive installed build 6956 but i still have that old boot screen with that green bar. How can i get the new boot screen? tnx for any help!!
You probably used the VHD. The iso fixes that
No, ive used the iso and did a clean install
no, ive used the iso and a clean install
When I first tried Vista a year after it was released, I really enjoyed the layout, but as I got to trying it out, like everyone I found a ton of problems. Incomplete platforms, not drives and many other issues. I spent many hours fixing my computer and discovered that if Microsoft would change man settings, check some boxes and make a variety of minor changes, the OS would not be fix, but 70% of the complaints were be taken care of. That would have bought MS so much goodwill. MS has come a long ways to fix Vista, but it has taken too long, after 2 years, some of it’s best and most loyal life long customers abandoned the OS. Who on earth would spend $1,000-$2,000 on hardware and then enjoy the feeling a $150 software program is forcing them to buy $200 more of hardware to have the same applications run worse and slower than on a 7 year older OS. It’s a recipe for disaster that happens every time MS tries to create a new OS.
Out of desperation, because MS refused to let it’s customer know what it was trying to fix and provide a schedule, it’s customers didn’t know it the problems that meant most to them would ever get fixed. Top that o with MS saying it saw nothing wrong with it and you have a lo of people returning expensive paperweights.
People like me, needing a solution immediately discovered if we purchased a computer with the same hardware we had an put XP, our problems would be solved. But MS took that away deliberately. Looking at the numbers, instead of buying a PC, I and many others purchased a Mac and added XP from our old computers. Suddenly you have users who have the hardware they want and are back to XP, but now have OSX.
This is not going to be an Apple is best post..As great as Apple has touted is graphics capability, they have not corrected a a lot of things that do not take advantage of the graphical architecture-in that sense Vista is better despite what Apple users say and believe. I only say that regardless of what OS MS puts out,the fact they keep saying expect it to be crap each time it’s released and for us to cut off your ability to us our better and older systems while you work out ALL the bugs, will inevitably have more people leaving. This thing has to work.
Apple is positioning itself now to fix it’s own bugs with Leopard and stabilize and fix it’s own bugs and make improvements with its hand held devices and remove the bloat. It is a clear attempt to demonstrate its OS can not only perform as good and run software applications that MS can run, but also demonstrate they have their first OS that now can take advantage of all the hardware they put into their computers and have an integrated system that runs better. You can see the strategy ad planning: Introduce stability and fixes on 3/09 or sooner ad then at the same time Vista 2 or Widows 7 comes out, introduce another OS change that will either add more bells and whistles, but also upgrade software for iworks office Suite to go head to head with MS Office.
My point is by the time MS has Windows 7 ready, it will or the first time not just be competing with it’s previous OS, but be going to to toe with with other OS and offices packages and other software packages from all corners-that includes open source from companies teaming together and whose goal is take away MS market share. Unless MS truly innovates in a way it has never done in the past a release like they say is normal will inevitably mean less profit for MS and more market share for the rest. MS know what it has to do and is working like mad to get it done ASAP!
I hope MS can complete. The greater the competition the better. I hope they can keep the rest of their changes under wraps and away from the dishonest people.
What did you mean here, I don’t know what you were trying to say when you said MS took it away deliberately:
“People like me, needing a solution immediately discovered if we purchased a computer with the same hardware we had an put XP, our problems would be solved. But MS took that away deliberately. Looking at the numbers, instead of buying a PC”
But I’m glad someone out there feels the same way I do. There is not enough innovation from Microsoft, although we are starting to see it with Windows 7. Aero Peek is going to be one of the most used features because of Widescreen monitors. Today I was using it to watch a podcast while quickly checking my email to see if I had received any PMs from a forum – great feature.
I think MS is trying to avoid a head-on battle with Snow Leopard, and some previous predictions of them releasing Windows 7 by April 2009 could now be very possible.
I think the reason why so many people converted over to Apple is because it just works. You buy a Macbook which looks sexy as hell. Part of the fun (I guess) when you buy something new is you experiment with it. The Mac OS is different but you can probably learn it in an hour or two, I learned in about 1 hour how to unzip and install and everything. You’re not going to run into a registry or hardware problem because you never buy the hardware separate from the software, so Apple guarantees you will be satisfied with what you buy, at least to your minimal expectations. Plus there are only 3 models of laptops, and you can’t go really go wrong picking 1 out of 3 for the Macbook.
Looks like you have a lot to say. Hope you can check out our new forums =)
Does anyone have a cd key?
I think you can leave it blank, and u have 21 days to activate it. imo
You have initially 30 days and after you can rearm it op till 3 times so in total you have about 120 days: Click on Start button and key in Cmd in Start Search box. Press on Ctrl-Shift-Enter to open Command Prompt with administrative credentials (equivalent to “Run as Administrator”). In the Command Prompt, type the following command and press Enter when done: slmgr -rearm or you can use sysprep /generalize. Reboot the computer.
Rearm again when the remaining activation grace period timer counts down to 0 days.
What is the best (and free) program to manipulate or mount VHD images? I have heard that WinMount 3.1 will do it, any thoughts on this? I currently use Virtual Clonedrive.
Windows 7 can attach VHD natively, but seems like ImageX is one of the more popular software out there
2 errors in the article:
1. You misspelled by nickname (it has 3 “l”s, and begins with a dot – unfortunately dots are not allowed on AeroXperience, but it is visible on TheHotfix).
2. The ISO is not the one built by me – it was built by the Chinese. I only had 10 parts out of 45 uploaded when this one leaked, so I canceled my version. (However, my ISO was essentially the same, just built using a slightly different method.)
Thanks for pointing it out, have fixed them =)
Good luck working out the bugs. You might as well
work for Microsoft.
thanks from tony
ntopics´s last blog post..Witchcraft (COMIC)
Quite frankly i still don’t get what the issue is all about, people are complaining because their Pentium 4 with 512MB of RAM, pc wouldn’t run vista with all bells and whistles, ok, tell me this if you fired up ITUNES, fired up IE 7, and open a few other apps, XP would be bought to its knees. For those who are bashing vista check the minimum specs
800MHZ Intel compatible processor
512mb OF RAM
A Directx 9 capable video card
sound, keyboard and mouse
I am a former network admin and anybody knows that what ms puts on the box as minimum specs should be doubled at least, i mean seriously did you really think you were going to run XP on a Penium 2 300mhz decently, i think not. In conclusion if your box is more than 5 years old, stop being a cheap ass and get some ram a video card and quit whining, gees. Btw
my laptop runs VISTA HOME PREMIUM just fine, save for the sidebar turned off
DELL INSPIRON 6000d
Intel Pentium M @ 1.7GHZ (Single core)
2GB of RAM PC6400
40GB ATA Hard drive
DVD-RW Drive
ATI MOBILITY RADEON X300 <–Shared memory
Onboard audio
So there proving my point, a 3 year old laptop running VISTA, and im willing to bet the same can be done with a CELERON, point taken, and proven, double the minimum specs and you should run VISTA fine.
Techyfreelancer
Computer parts are fairly cheap nowadays so there should be no complaints at all about Windows 7′s hardware requirements. My brother runs XP on P4 3.2GhZ and doesn’t really have any problems with lag while gaming, browsing, chatting, and iTunes at the same time. I do think though, that at Vista’s release date, the hardware requirements were a bit high-end at those times
I have a Toshiba Satellite L40, Intel Celeron M @ 1.86 GHz and roughly the same specs as Techfreelancer, and vista runs fine (though without the sidebar)
The people complaining probably haven’t got SP1 on yet. SP1 fixes everything, but too bad not enough people know
Does anybody know if this build contains the new Live Messenger RC expected for this week?
All builds seem to require you to download Messenger on your own for now
hate to be a jerk but shut the f*ck up if you havent tried Win7 then dont ocmment on it running poor i’ve already run it on a celeron 1.8ghz with 1gb of ram and it ran perfectly smooth…. it runs A LOT better than vista and in some areas seems faster than even my xp that i have it dual booting with.
Also whats with the bitching over not being able to run every bell and whistle of an OS just because of your crappy specs… thats like bitching that crysis doesnt work on your intel integrated card at 900fps
wow seems like a lot of people (including myself) are finding themselves to become very passionate about Windows 7. Personally I’m not an Apple fan for many reasons, so it seems like I’m going to be more supportive of Microsoft over the coming months because it seems like they’re going to release an OS right this time around.
Most people like to just jump onboard with what everyone is saying, myth or not, without even knowing, which is very sad. I hope as we near release date, more people will have better knowledge of what Windows 7 really is =)
yeah this is obviously where they went to fix Vista. I hope they don’t mess it up any from what it is now with 6956. only hiccups I’m getting are typical minor IE8 bugs which are only mildly annoying. this redeems MS to me, if they don’t blow it. wonder if I can just keep the 6956 if it goes downhill from here? since when is ANYTHING not hackable for an activation?
I’m running Win 7 Build 6801 with the BlueBadge features turned on as default OS now on my laptop, my mediacenter (A 4yr old Intel P4ht, 1GB, 60GB, 512MB vid), and the x64 on my desktop machine and I just have to say I’m impressed. I’ve installed the 6956 build on another desktop on Sunday and this build seems to have improved quite a bit. I’ve never been very enthousiastic about Vista as the resources taken by some of the features used for sales (Sidebar, Aero, etc) do take up a lot of resources if you’d like to play with it (I’ve had Sidebar using 450MB of memory, which I consider too much for my laptop) though it has 2Gig. Really, I’m very pleased with Win7 up till now and I really hope MS does continue and keep this OS proper.
I did not test windows 7 until now.What i have seen from looks ok to me.I wouldn’t give a comment how it works until i didn’t feld it my self.But the eventual bugs and anyoing things you can find out anyway only when you run it in your all days and use it.Then you see if it can be a full new option to an already proven reliable OS.(and i am not meaning Vista here)
ive again format my hdd en reinstalled this build, but still no new bootscreen. i use the iso 2,19 gb.
Try running these commands from an admin/elevated command prompt:
bcdedit /set {current} inherit {bootloadersettings}
bcdedit /set {current} locale en-US
ive tried and reboot, but still the same…
BTW this is what I have as my BCD entry (your resume and recovery GUIDs will be different – the resume GUID should be good to go already, while the recovery one will likely be missing – check C:\Recovery for the correct GUID):
Windows Boot Loader
——————-
identifier {current}
device partition=C:
path \Windows\system32\winload.exe
description Microsoft Windows 7
locale en-US
inherit {bootloadersettings}
recoverysequence {21184555-a714-11dd-98ee-cb33760e8474}
recoveryenabled Yes
osdevice partition=C:
systemroot \Windows
resumeobject {21184553-a714-11dd-98ee-cb33760e8474}
nx OptIn
Sorry, wrong one, here it is:
Windows Boot Loader
——————-
identifier {21184559-a714-11dd-98ee-cb33760e8474}
device partition=Q:
path \Windows\system32\winload.exe
description Microsoft Windows 7, build 6956 (WIP)
locale en-US
inherit {bootloadersettings}
recoverysequence {21184555-a714-11dd-98ee-cb33760e8474}
recoveryenabled Yes
osdevice partition=Q:
systemroot \Windows
resumeobject {492aa951-c3d1-11dd-816a-806e6f6e6963}
nx OptIn
detecthal Yes
hi,
how do i do that?
Windows Boot Loader
——————-
identifier {current}
device partition=C:
path \Windows\system32\winload.exe
description Windows 7
locale en-US
inherit {bootloadersettings}
osdevice partition=C:
systemroot \Windows
resumeobject {557c85a0-c6f8-11dd-b971-92ee4ae90038}
nx OptIn
Do you have build 6801 installed as well?
no, clean install, formatted my hdd
Likely the new boot screen will only work if 6801 is installed first.
BTW did you have 6801 installed earlier? If so, did it display the “blue bar” bootscreen or the Vista-style one?
before i formated my hdd i had 6801, the vista styled one is green.
so i must first install 6801 and then UPGRADE to 6956?
No, I only wanted to know whether you got the high-res bootscreen in 6801. You didn’t, so it’s likely your hardware that doesn’t support it.
weird, why doesn’t support my hardware?
- Intel Core 2 Extreme X9650 3.0Ghz
- 4GB DDR3
- Nvidia 9800 GX2
Are you installing on a SATA HDD? If so, try switching between IDE and AHCI modes.
ive indeed a sata hdd installed, how do i switch between ide and ahci? whats is ahci?
There is a setting called “SATA operation mode” or something like that in the BIOS, which usually has 3 values, “IDE”, “AHCI” and “RAID”. If it’s “RAID”, then it is likely the source of the problem. Otherwise, try switching from IDE to AHCI and vice versa.
i could not find an option called “SATA operation mode” in the bios and RAID is disabled (only one hdd). Ive tried to set to default settings, but didn’t work. and disable fast boot didn’t work too.
Is this a P35/P45 board?
the motherboard is:
Asus P5N64 WS PRO EPU 790i SLI, SATA2 RAID, SAS
Hmm… nForce? Maybe that’s why it doesn’t work. Complain to MS once the beta starts.
why doesn’t work with nvidia cpus?
gpu*?
The problem is the nVidia [b]chipset[/b]. Intel chipset+nVidia GPU will work, that’s what I use.
it installs a custom ms version of nvidia chipset that works MUCH better than my NVIDIA geforce/nforce ever did. amazed at the driver catalogue contained on this disk!!!
are you sure the problem is the compatibility with the nivia chipset? if so, how can i complain to MS once the beta starts?
http://blogs.msdn.com/e7/ Official windows 7 blog where you can also send feedback trough giving comments to MS , Windows 7 latest build is 6956 what leaked 4 days ago , Windows 7 has feedback icon on desktop also….
, Beta comes 13january with probably full support and full of new features
Windows 7 can be upgraded from Vista
Current Win7 can be mounted with daemontools and then you can install without butting it on DVD
DVD Disk size is already 2,19gb but it can be even more smaller
Why they got bad driver support is weird , didn’t recognize my internet card
Pr1XseL´s last blog post..Accessibility in Windows 7
in package are 3 jpg screen shoots.
thanks
Now this is fast! Finally I get to see what my new p.c. has to offer without that bloated mess Vista. I dualbooted 6956 iso and have never gone back to the other partition. It is a smaller download, lightweight, and you feel the tighter control of ram in everything you do. At first the expanded task bar functions were overwhelming, but after my second day I am now dealing my windows and programs like a spread-out deck.
Was also alarmed by Spybot (only one out of dozens of top scans) finding the .sober worm in System 32 however it’s been thoroughly vetted in torrent comments as a false positive since the only code contained in the file is the display of the cmd window. No one should make thispre-beta their primary anyway, since it cannot be activated (yet) and has 3 30-day rearms possible by which time the beta will be released.
the only problem with Windows 7 6956 is that it has shitty driver support- my mouse gave out within a week of installing it
[...] its true, the Chinese have leaked Windows 7.. again (the previous incident occurred during WinHEC China). This time, its the beta with version number starting with a [...]
hi
32ay1zgr20nedy1z
good luck
[...] I posted some screen shots from the build 6956 which were leaked by a WinHEC China attendee, instantly fell in love with them and ended up getting my hands on the copy (from you know where) [...]
vayamierdawindows
vayamierdawindows
vayamierdawindows
vayamierdawindows
I think better to install Windows 7 Ultimate
and link for download Windows 7 Ultimate here: http://file.sh/?q=Windows+7+Ultimate+torrent.html
[...] the first time a Windows 7 build has leaked from China that didn’t come from a TAP release. Last year, Chinese attendees managed to leak Windows 7 Build 6956 off the WinHEC [...]
check out the latest news and intresting reviews abt windows7
on…http://news-revuez.blogspot.com/
Thats a sweet post! I am so glad you decided to publish it.
could you email me a screenshot that proves that it works?