<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The &#8220;real&#8221; Windows 7 testers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://windows7center.com/news/the-real-windows-7-testers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://windows7center.com/news/the-real-windows-7-testers/</link>
	<description>Windows 7 news, rumors, screenshots, and info</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:33:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://windows7center.com/news/the-real-windows-7-testers/#comment-7355</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 21:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7center.com/?p=4482#comment-7355</guid>
		<description>Approve the link? I don&#039;t mind you posting your link here as long as its not spamming. The more perspective, the better =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Approve the link? I don&#8217;t mind you posting your link here as long as its not spamming. The more perspective, the better =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Halsey</title>
		<link>http://windows7center.com/news/the-real-windows-7-testers/#comment-7354</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Halsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 21:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7center.com/?p=4482#comment-7354</guid>
		<description>This is exactly what I wrote about the other day.  It&#039;s ridiculous the shoddy way in which tech-testers were treated.

http://windows7news.com/2009/07/23/wont-fix-a-review-of-the-windows-7-beta-programme/

(if you&#039;ll approve the link)

:o)  Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is exactly what I wrote about the other day.  It&#8217;s ridiculous the shoddy way in which tech-testers were treated.</p>
<p><a href="http://windows7news.com/2009/07/23/wont-fix-a-review-of-the-windows-7-beta-programme/" rel="nofollow">http://windows7news.com/2009/07/23/wont-fix-a-review-of-the-windows-7-beta-programme/</a></p>
<p>(if you&#8217;ll approve the link)</p>
<p> <img src='http://windows7center.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> )  Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://windows7center.com/news/the-real-windows-7-testers/#comment-7329</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 16:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7center.com/?p=4482#comment-7329</guid>
		<description>Well surely you didn&#039;t beleive that they would change Windows Explorer just because you made a suggestion? With CEIP they were just looking for things alot of people were complaining about, they weren&#039;t taking UI suggestions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well surely you didn&#8217;t beleive that they would change Windows Explorer just because you made a suggestion? With CEIP they were just looking for things alot of people were complaining about, they weren&#8217;t taking UI suggestions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yoda</title>
		<link>http://windows7center.com/news/the-real-windows-7-testers/#comment-7264</link>
		<dc:creator>Yoda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7center.com/?p=4482#comment-7264</guid>
		<description>May be some truth in your story.
MS appear to have ignored my suggestions to fix glaring omissions in Windows Explorer.
As a result an another alternatives such as - &quot;Ultra Explorer&quot; and even Free commander are thriving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May be some truth in your story.<br />
MS appear to have ignored my suggestions to fix glaring omissions in Windows Explorer.<br />
As a result an another alternatives such as &#8211; &#8220;Ultra Explorer&#8221; and even Free commander are thriving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
